← Publications

THE ARCHITECTURE OF REALITY · PAPER II

Coherence
Regulation
Band Theory

An Architectural Framework for Coherence-Regulated Reality

Gábor JandóPreprint · July 202668 pages
Conceptual Slip Band plate showing bounded regulatory adaptation
Paper II · The slip band as a region of regulated adaptation

ABSTRACT / POSITION

Stability is sustained within bounds.

CRBT is a time-free architectural framework for systems whose persistence depends on bounded coherence regulation rather than convergence to static equilibrium. Adaptive systems remain viable not by eliminating deviation, but by preserving coherence within a non-zero slip band.

The theory does not reject prediction. It treats prediction as local, scale-dependent and limited by informational accessibility. Regulation can remain viable where global extrapolation cannot, because it acts on accessible coherence deviation rather than requiring a complete future-state model.

STABILITY

Persistent band-preservation, not stillness or exact convergence.

SLIP

A necessary degree of freedom between frozen order and loss of viability.

Π OPERATOR

A bounded, non-predictive selection rule acting on present coherence deviation.

CONCEPT FILM · 04

The Slip Band — Stability Through Bounded Deviation

A visual introduction to the central CRBT proposition: stability is neither exact convergence nor unrestricted variation, but the persistent preservation of a viable, non-zero band of regulated deviation.

Download film ↓
50 seconds · English captions · Sound on

CANONICAL OPERATOR Π

Selection without foresight.

Π resolves a regulated landscape into a viable configuration. It does not optimize a future trajectory or assign meaning; it maps accessible deviation into a bounded response.

DEVIATIONeₖ = C* − C(Σₖ)BOUNDED RESPONSEΠα(eₖ) = tanh(αeₖ)

The tanh response is illustrative rather than exclusive: the architectural requirement is a smooth, bounded and locally sensitive response.

Pi regulation operator acting within a coherence window and bounded state space
Π — Regulation without Representation

CANONICAL ARCHITECTURE

Four invariants

The paper is deliberately articulated at two resolutions: a progressive conceptual argument and a compact C1–C4 architectural restatement.

C1

Regulation without Representation

Bounded coherence regulation can maintain viability without an internal model, symbolic description or future-state prediction.

C2

Slip as Informational Gate

Slip is not simply noise or failure. It is the bounded interface through which previously silent deviation becomes structurally accessible.

C3

Prediction as Accessibility-Limited

Prediction remains useful locally, but cannot be assumed globally when the informational state needed for extrapolation is itself resolution-conditioned.

C4

Stability without Prediction

Persistent stability arises through repeated local regulation and mutual compatibility, not necessarily through convergence to a static endpoint.

C1–C4 / DIAGRAMMATIC READING

One structure,
four constraints.

The TikZ figures are preserved as sharp vector graphics for close reading on screen.

Regulation without Representation diagram
C1Regulation without RepresentationThe regulatory loop acts on accessible coherence deviation. Prediction and explicit internal representation are not primitive requirements.
Slip as Informational Gate diagram
C2Slip as Informational GateThe slip band separates silent regulation from the regime in which deviation becomes informationally accessible.
Prediction as Accessibility-Limited diagram
C3Prediction as Accessibility-LimitedRegulation uses present accessible deviation; predictive extrapolation faces an accessibility gap when required information is unavailable.
Stability via Bounded Slip diagram
C4Stability via Bounded SlipAdaptive stability occupies a bounded, non-zero band: exact convergence freezes dynamics, while excessive deviation loses viability.

CROSS-SCALE INVARIANCE

A regulatory pattern, not a domain-specific mechanism.

The paper proposes the coherence-regulation loop as an architectural form that can be instantiated across physical, biological, cognitive and artificial systems. This is a structural comparison, not a claim that these domains share identical mechanisms.

Coherence regulation loop across physical, biological, cognitive and artificial scales
Fig. D7 · Cross-scale structural invariance
Bridge from regulation to persistence through an accessible coherence basin
Bridge to Ontology · From Regulation to Persistence

BRIDGE TO PAPER III

From regulation to persistence.

The closing bridge asks when a configuration remains structurally accessible across ordinal updates. Persistence is interpreted as continued reachability within a bounded coherence basin, preparing the transition from regulation to information, fields and matter.

The figure expresses an architectural interpretation of persistence; it does not define reality as a substance or present empirical validation.

SCOPE & BOUNDARIES

Formal claims kept distinct from interpretation.

CRBT generalizes familiar concerns from feedback, nonlinear dynamics and viability without presenting itself as a replacement for those theories.

  • Prediction is retained as a useful local capability where the required information is accessible.
  • Π does not represent intention, meaning or learning.
  • Update index k denotes ordinal regulatory ordering, not physical time.
  • The numerical examples are illustrative toy models, not empirical validation.

PUBLICATION RECORD

How to cite

Jandó, G. (2026). Coherence Regulation Band Theory: An Architectural Framework for Coherence-Regulated Reality [Preprint]. Zenodo.

STATUS
Preprint

Paper II turns coherence regulation into the primary object of study—and prepares the move from stable accessibility to information and material persistence.

Open the complete preprint on Zenodo ↗